A man who spent six months in prison accused of carrying out an acid attack was freed on the first day of his trial. As a result, a judge has called on the Crown Prosecution Service to expand its review of disclosure failures.
When the case eventually came to trial at Liverpool Crown Court the prosecution offered no evidence. Anthony Brack, 51, would have faced up to 16 years in jail if convicted.
Both the police and CPS were criticised by judge Steven Everett after evidence belatedly showed the victim had a medical history of burning herself with bleach and CCTV footage undermining her account of events.
Everett said he was astonished that the medical evidence had not been seen earlier, adding: "On the face of it, it seriously undermined the case."
Everett told the court: "Disclosure is a major issue as we all know and has been for a little while following various acquittals to people charged with rape.
"I am beginning to have real concerns that what really happened was that there was a review for rape and sexual assault allegations and the review was limited to that.
"I don't know if that is right, but if that is right then the review was seriously flawed … the CPS and police will have to look at other case notes where there are assaults – not just sexual assault."
The managing director of the Centre for Criminal Appeals, Suzanne Gower, which investigates miscarriages of justice, said: "This case is a stark reminder that failures by police and prosecutors to turn over vital evidence are not limited to rape cases."
A CPS spokesperson said: "We keep all cases under continual review. Following receipt of further information from the police at the start of the trial we concluded there was no longer a realistic prospect of conviction and stopped the prosecution.
"We note the comments of the judge and will work with the police to review the handling of this case and any lessons which can be learned."
For confidential legal advice call our specialist team of solicitors on 01606 834 824
Blain Boland
Cheshire Solicitors